Home / Reading time / 60,000 words
How long does it take to read 60,000 words?
About 4 h at 250 words per minute, the average adult reading speed.
At your speed
| Reading speed | Time | |
|---|---|---|
| 200 WPM | 5 h | slower than average |
| 250 WPM | 4 h | the average adult pace |
| 300 WPM | 3 h 20 min | a comfortable fast reader |
| 450 WPM | 2 h 13 min | trained, or RSVP |
| 600 WPM | 1 h 40 min | RSVP at speed |
Most people do not know their own number, and the guess is usually too high. Measure it in two minutes and the row that applies to you stops being a guess.
What 60,000 words actually looks like
Roughly a short novel. That comparison is worth more than the minutes, because 4 h of a novel and 4 h of a textbook are not the same afternoon. On difficult material the limit is thinking, not looking, and no reading technique moves that very far.
That is about 200 pages in a trade paperback, or 218 in a mass-market one. Page counts move around far more than word counts, which is why this page is built on the words.
Read it faster, if it is the kind of thing that can be
ReadKinetic shows one word at a time, in the same spot, so your eyes stop travelling. On familiar prose that is real time saved. It is free, needs no account, opens the books you already own, and nothing you read leaves your device.
Open ReadKinetic →Common questions
How long does it take to read 60,000 words?
About 4 h at 250 words per minute, which is the average adult reading speed for non-fiction. A slow reader at 200 WPM takes 5 h; a fast one at 400 takes 2 h 30 min.
Is 60,000 words a lot to read?
It is roughly a short novel. Whether that is a lot depends entirely on what it is: 4 h of a novel goes faster than 4 h of a textbook, because the limit on difficult material is thinking rather than looking.
How many pages is 60,000 words?
About 200 pages in a trade paperback at 300 words a page, or about 218 in a mass-market paperback. Page counts vary far more than word counts, which is why the word count is the better number to work from.
Can you read it faster than that?
Up to a point, and the honest answer is that it depends on the material. Removing eye movement with RSVP takes out the part of reading that is mechanical, which on familiar prose is real time. On dense or unfamiliar material the limit is comprehension, not eye movement, and no technique moves that much.